<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Singapore National Registry of Accredited Renovators Archives | LushHomeMedia</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.lushhomemedia.com/tag/singapore-national-registry-of-accredited-renovators/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link></link>
	<description>Singapore Real Estate &#38; Services</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 02:19:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.2.9</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Renovation aggravation</title>
		<link>https://www.lushhomemedia.com/renovation-aggravation/</link>
					<comments>https://www.lushhomemedia.com/renovation-aggravation/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[luxuryasiahome]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 02:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Radac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Radac Standard Contract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renovation and Decoration Advisory Centre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Singapore National Registry of Accredited Renovators]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lushhome.wordpress.com/?p=5703</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Radac-accredited company refused to use the Radac Standard Contract About three weeks ago, I was sourcing for home renovation contractors. After performing some due diligence and referring to the Singapore National Registry of Accredited Renovators 2007 &#8211; a book given to purchasers by the Housing and Development Board (HDB) on the day of the final [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.lushhomemedia.com/renovation-aggravation/">Renovation aggravation</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.lushhomemedia.com">LushHomeMedia</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="post-entry">
<p><em><strong>Radac-accredited company refused to use the Radac Standard Contract</strong></em></p>
<p>About three weeks ago, I was sourcing for home renovation contractors. After performing some due diligence and referring to the Singapore National Registry of Accredited Renovators 2007 &#8211; a book given to purchasers by the Housing and Development Board (HDB) on the day of the final sales transaction &#8211; I contacted a company that was a member of the Renovation and Decoration Advisory Centre (Radac).</p>
<p>I specifically stipulated my requirement that a Radac Standard Contract be used. Initially, the sales designer had confidently acknowledged this.</p>
<p>However, after three weeks of negotiation, the sales designer came up with the company’s own agreement with their own terms of payment, claiming that was the Radac Standard Contract.</p>
<p>I advised him to purchase a copy of the contract from Radac to use and waited for a week before he finally replied.</p>
<p>He stated that his boss would not sign the Radac Standard Contract as his firm does not use it. I called off the deal, after having put so much faith on Radac and its accredited member scheme, as well as having expended so much precious time.</p>
<p>Under the eight “commandments” of renovation published in the registry, the fifth one states that: “Consumers should ensure that a proper contract is drawn out before renovation. They are advised to use the Radac Standard Contract for Radac Accredited Renovators.”</p>
<p>According to the Radac website, the contract contains legal terms and obligations covering negotiable payment terms and warranties, among other clauses, to protect both parties.</p>
<p>The contract drafted by the firm was not equitable.</p>
<p>I urge Radac to constantly review their members’ activities and ensure the members abide to the standards as stated in the Radac constitution and live up to the corporate mission.</p>
<p>I would also suggest that the Ministry of National Development or the HDB look into the feasibility of introducing a Standard Renovator Contract and publish quarterly renovation cost data and guidelines to help educate and protect consumers from errant contractors.</p>
<p><em>Raymond Ng</em></p>
<p><em>Source : Today &#8211; 29 Apr 2008</em><!-- END POST-ENTRY --></p>
</div>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.lushhomemedia.com/renovation-aggravation/">Renovation aggravation</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.lushhomemedia.com">LushHomeMedia</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.lushhomemedia.com/renovation-aggravation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 
Content Delivery Network via N/A
Minified using Disk
Database Caching 8/99 queries in 0.071 seconds using Disk

Served from: www.lushhomemedia.com @ 2026-06-09 16:48:12 by W3 Total Cache
-->